Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nic Norris's avatar

“Christlike character and consistency” is likely the only thing that will change an unbelieving heart to a believing heart.

I, too, have experienced numerous accounts where I tried to persuade an unbeliever to believe in the gospel. The result: high frustration and low yield.

I do think, however, that it is worth mentioning that debate and intellectual discourse has its place. It does not seem to effective as a method of promulgating the gospel (as witnessed in scripture), but it does seem prominent as a method to align “Christlike character and consistency” within the church.

Moses and God debated over the salvation of Israel. Abraham bargained with God over the people of Sodom. Job debated his innocence with God. God himself, through the prophet Isaiah beckons us to come with our arguments against him (Is 1:18).

In the NT Paul and Peter disagreed over inconsistent behaviour with Gentiles. Paul and Barnabas went seperating ways because of a disagreement about the effectiveness of John Mark.

A good portion of the epistles is Paul making an argument against the beliefs or actions against the church.

Needless to say, while we should never approach an unbeliever from a position of intellectual superiority, we ought also be willing to subject ourselves to the critique of our own beliefs and behaviours from fellow Christians.

Great post! Always appreciate a glimpse into what you are thinking about.

Expand full comment
Daniel Bracamonte's avatar

Fantastic article. Sage advice grounded in real world experience!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts